http://blog.3plus4.org/2008/11/23/brazil-example-a-classic-smalltalk-browser/ The neighbourhood of 7 Wed, 12 May 2010 16:29:09 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 http://blog.3plus4.org/2008/11/23/brazil-example-a-classic-smalltalk-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1348 Vassili Bykov Tue, 25 Nov 2008 06:44:18 +0000 http://blog.3plus4.org/?p=75#comment-1348 Hi Carl, you make it sound like there is no other way but Morphic to draw cross-platform graphics. See "It's not about widgets" in the previous post. As for custom widgets, see "When it's about widgets, it's about native widgets" in the same place. So the answer is no, it does not permit that because a) there is no need to, and b) because Brazil is not a framework for Squeak. There may come a time when it runs in something that doesn't have Morphic in it. Hi Carl, you make it sound like there is no other way but Morphic to draw cross-platform graphics. See “It’s not about widgets” in the previous post. As for custom widgets, see “When it’s about widgets, it’s about native widgets” in the same place. So the answer is no, it does not permit that because a) there is no need to, and b) because Brazil is not a framework for Squeak. There may come a time when it runs in something that doesn’t have Morphic in it.

]]> http://blog.3plus4.org/2008/11/23/brazil-example-a-classic-smalltalk-browser/comment-page-1/#comment-1347 Carl Gundel Mon, 24 Nov 2008 19:15:33 +0000 http://blog.3plus4.org/?p=75#comment-1347 Here's a slightly OT question. Does Brazil permit the inclusion of Morphic or other Squeak widgets into a native OS window so that applications can draw their own graphics and have custom widgets in a cross platform way? Here’s a slightly OT question. Does Brazil permit the inclusion of Morphic or other Squeak widgets into a native OS window so that applications can draw their own graphics and have custom widgets in a cross platform way?

]]>