<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Rethinking the comma</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.3plus4.org/2007/09/02/rethinking-the-comma/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.3plus4.org/2007/09/02/rethinking-the-comma/</link>
	<description>The neighbourhood of 7</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 16:29:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vassili Bykov</title>
		<link>http://blog.3plus4.org/2007/09/02/rethinking-the-comma/comment-page-1/#comment-1123</link>
		<dc:creator>Vassili Bykov</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Oct 2007 19:14:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.3plus4.org/2007/09/02/rethinking-the-comma/#comment-1123</guid>
		<description>Yes, this can only be implemented by modifying the compiler. A comma interpreted this way isn&#039;t a message send at all, however, just like a semicolon and a period aren&#039;t messages in regular Smalltalk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, this can only be implemented by modifying the compiler. A comma interpreted this way isn&#8217;t a message send at all, however, just like a semicolon and a period aren&#8217;t messages in regular Smalltalk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mlq</title>
		<link>http://blog.3plus4.org/2007/09/02/rethinking-the-comma/comment-page-1/#comment-1122</link>
		<dc:creator>mlq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Oct 2007 15:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.3plus4.org/2007/09/02/rethinking-the-comma/#comment-1122</guid>
		<description>I know you posted this a month-and-a-half ago... but... no matter what you choose, you&#039;re going to need to modify the compiler, right?  To have a message type that has a lower precedence than keyword?  unary &gt; binary &gt; keyword ...  Or am I just slow, and that has already been discussed and I missed it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you posted this a month-and-a-half ago&#8230; but&#8230; no matter what you choose, you&#8217;re going to need to modify the compiler, right?  To have a message type that has a lower precedence than keyword?  unary &gt; binary &gt; keyword &#8230;  Or am I just slow, and that has already been discussed and I missed it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bernhard</title>
		<link>http://blog.3plus4.org/2007/09/02/rethinking-the-comma/comment-page-1/#comment-1121</link>
		<dc:creator>Bernhard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Oct 2007 07:49:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.3plus4.org/2007/09/02/rethinking-the-comma/#comment-1121</guid>
		<description>This is a change which will break a lot of existing Smalltalk programs. However, I really, really like it. It should be done. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a change which will break a lot of existing Smalltalk programs. However, I really, really like it. It should be done. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Viktor Svub</title>
		<link>http://blog.3plus4.org/2007/09/02/rethinking-the-comma/comment-page-1/#comment-1013</link>
		<dc:creator>Viktor Svub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Sep 2007 14:08:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.3plus4.org/2007/09/02/rethinking-the-comma/#comment-1013</guid>
		<description>would be really nice to push this in squeak-dev a bit more forcefully :)  
personally i don&#039;t like the &quot;comma message&quot; much:  
1. #+ seems more intuitive way of joining strings (anything) together and  
2. it&#039;s a bit confusing, cause $. and $; are syntactic elements already</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>would be really nice to push this in squeak-dev a bit more forcefully :)<br />
personally i don&#8217;t like the &#8220;comma message&#8221; much:<br />
1. #+ seems more intuitive way of joining strings (anything) together and<br />
2. it&#8217;s a bit confusing, cause $. and $; are syntactic elements already</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: akuhn</title>
		<link>http://blog.3plus4.org/2007/09/02/rethinking-the-comma/comment-page-1/#comment-911</link>
		<dc:creator>akuhn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2007 11:53:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.3plus4.org/2007/09/02/rethinking-the-comma/#comment-911</guid>
		<description>+1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>+1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
